State v. Myers
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant was convicted in a bench trial of seven counts of sexual exploitation of children in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-6A-3(D) (2001). Defendant appeals, asserting: (1) the photographs on which the prosecution was based do not satisfy the statutory elements of the offense; (2) the statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to Defendant’s conduct; and (3) Defendant’s constitutional rights were violated because neither the grand jury nor any witness at trial correlated particular photographs to any particular counts in the indictment. We agree with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. DostDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1986
- Jewell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011