Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 21, 1984No. 2 CA-SA 0072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Petitioners’ special action challenges the respondent court’s refusal to honor petitioners’ notice of change of judge. Because the petitioners are without an adequate remedy by appeal, and because the respondent court proceeded in excess of her jurisdiction, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

The real parties in interest are plaintiffs in a case filed on March 29, 1982, alleging as causes of action against the petitioners consumer fraud, racketeering, common law fraud, breach of contract and violation of truth-in-lending laws. On September 6, 1983, the real parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marsin v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Estate of CuneoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Itasca State Bank v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guarrascio v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API