Legal Opinion
State v. Owens
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 2014No. 14-KA-41PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT A. CHAISSON, Judge.
12In this appeal, defendant, Jamar Owens, asserts that his criminal convictions should be reversed and a new trial granted based on improper prosecutorial rebuttal argument and the improper admission of recorded telephone calls from the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center. For the reasons that follow, we find no merit to defendant’s arguments. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions and sentences; however, we remand the matter for correction of errors patent as noted herein.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On July 22, 2013, defendant proceeded to trial in Jefferson Parish on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. VansantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. HarrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Owens v. VannoyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020