Legal Opinion

Self v. Langley Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 9, 1922No. 11024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decree reads as follows:

The petitioners in the above-stated case are stockholders of the Langley Mills, owing some of its first preferred stock; a larger amount of common stock, and a very considerable portion of second preferred stock. As such stockholders they brought this petition for mandamus against the defendant corporation and against George E. Spofford, he being the only one of its directors who is a resident of the State of South Carolina. The material allegations of the petition are as follows:

That the defendant the Langley Mills is a corporation organized and doing business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. Brumley v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. State v. Pan American Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Childs v. Park & Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Jolly v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API