Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jolly v. Marion National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 1976No. 20330Published

1DissentLittlejohn, Justice

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the order of the lower court.

I am not at all sure but that the trial judge has already exercised his discretion in issuing the writ of mandamus. If not, he can do so now. Whether he did or did not, after he concluded, as obviously he did, that the petitioner was entitled to relief as a matter of right, failure to issue the writ would have amounted to an abuse of discretion. Although the issuance of a writ of mandamus is generally within the discretion of the court, it is not always so. A statutory right (as here) should not be denied as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Durnin v. Allentown Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. People ex rel. Lorge v. Consolidated National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Most v. First National Bank of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Murray v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API