Legal Opinion
Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 22, 2011No. 26930PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
Respondent brought this inverse condemnation action against South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT). The master in equity granted summary judgment in favor of respondent. SCDOT appeals. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent owned a tract of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Killian Road (running east to west) and Farrow Road (running north to south). A railroad track owned by Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern) runs parallel to Farrow Road, adjacent to respondent’s property. Respondent never had direct access to Farrow Road from its property.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Ludwick v. This Minute of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clegg Ex Rel. Estate of CleggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- City of Rock Hill v. CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sallie Zeigler v. Eastman Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Lord v. D & J Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Miranda C. v. Nissan Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- McAlhany v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Carolina Convenience Stores, Inc. v. City of SpartanburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.