Legal Opinion

Miranda C. v. Nissan Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-190226; No. 5106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this defective-design products liability action, Appellants/Respondents Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and Nissan North America, Inc. (collectively, Nissan) appeal the circuit court’s denial of its post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) based on Respondent/Appellant Miranda C.’s (Miranda) failure to prove a feasible alternative design as required by Branham v. Ford Motor Company, 390 S.C. 203, 701 S.E.2d 5 (2010). On cross-appeal, Miranda argues the circuit court erred in granting Nissan’s alternative request for a new trial. In addition, Miranda claims the circuit court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sallie Zeigler v. Eastman Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Lord v. D & J Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Holland ex rel. Knox v. Morbark, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Buncher v. LM General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  5. Jacob Jackson v. Eastman Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API