Legal Opinion

Anthony J. Antonious, Cross-Appellee v. Progroup, Inc., Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1983No. 82-5192, 82-5221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Antonious, the inventor of a patent for an athletic glove, appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in this jury-tried patent infringement action.

Antonious, the owner of U.S. Patent No. 3,588,917, asserts that ProGroup’s sales of certain velcro fastened golf gloves infringe claims 1, 2 and 9 of his patent. In addition to a general denial, ProGroup asserts invalidity for a number of reasons including failure to adequately claim the linchpin of the invention, the location of the flexible fastening tab on the back of the glove in line with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Products Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  2. Hart-Carter Co. v. J.P. Burroughs & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API