Legal Opinion

Holscher v. Ferry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 28, 1955No. 17421PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court and plaintiffs in error were defendants in an action to rescind a contract between Charles N. Ferry and Paul F. Holscher, who was deceased at the time the action was commenced. We will for convenience refer to plaintiff as Ferry and the defendants (who are the administratrix of the Holscher estate and the heirs of said decedent) as the estate. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Ferry and decreed a rescission of the contract. The estate brings the cause here by writ of error.

The facts were stipulated. Prior to May 23, 1952 Ferry was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Auld v. TravisColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Cook v. Covey-Ballard Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. McKenzie v. CrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
  4. Louis Cook Plumbing and Heating, Inc. v. Frank Briscoe Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. H & K Automotive Supply Co. v. Moore & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API