Strauss v. University of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Halpern, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
My approach to this case is somewhat different from that of Justice Bebgan. I start with the premise that the rule-making power of the Board of Regents with respect to advertising by optometrists is a very restricted one. Its rules in that area may only reflect and articulate the existing standards of the profession. The board may not forbid a type of advertising which is not condemned by accepted professional standards, even though it believes it to be objectionable. This limitation upon the board’s rule-making power results from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Packer Collegiate Institute v. University of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Matter of Cherry v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Dubin v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955