Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Carex Investigations & Security Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1977No. 9056PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The appellant, Paul Albert Wagner, filed this action against the respondents-defendants to recover damages for a false arrest. The district judge granted summary judgment in favor of respondents, which was predicated on appellant’s failure to answer respondents’ request for certain admissions, as provided under NRCP 36(a). 2 Appellant seeks reversal of the order below, and the principal issue presented is whether the district judge abused his discretion in granting the order in the instant case.

1. The Facts.

The case is focused on a false arrest complaint wherein appellant seeks damages…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Lerner Shops of Nevada, Inc. v. MarinNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Robert N. Cameron and Jack Crawford v. Vancouver Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allied Gas & Chemical Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Wibbels v. UnickNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Woods v. Label Investment Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. La-Tex Partnership v. DetersNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. ESTATE OF MICHAEL DAVID ADAMS VS. FALLININevada Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API