McDowell v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
BuoNsoN, J.
This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance. Defendant has appealed from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying judgment non obstante or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The facts are: Plaintiff owned a half section of land with two separate dwellings thereon. On Jan. lYth, 1918, defendant issued its policy of $1,000 for a term of three years upon one of these dwellings. This dwelling was distant about three fourths of a mile from the other, the home dwelling. The former was then occupied by a tenant. Later, it was occupied by plaintiff’s son…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Beauchamp v. Retail Merchants Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ennis v. Retail Merchants Ass'n Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Continental Fire Ins. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weber v. United Hardware & Implement Mutuals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Ulledalen v. the United States Fire Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Pfaffengut v. Export InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Ley v. Home Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933