Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

BuoNsoN, J.

This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance. Defendant has appealed from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying judgment non obstante or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The facts are: Plaintiff owned a half section of land with two separate dwellings thereon. On Jan. lYth, 1918, defendant issued its policy of $1,000 for a term of three years upon one of these dwellings. This dwelling was distant about three fourths of a mile from the other, the home dwelling. The former was then occupied by a tenant. Later, it was occupied by plaintiff’s son…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Beauchamp v. Retail Merchants Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Ennis v. Retail Merchants Ass'n Mutual Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Continental Fire Ins. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weber v. United Hardware & Implement Mutuals Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ulledalen v. the United States Fire Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pfaffengut v. Export InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Ley v. Home Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API