Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2004No. S113929Published

1Dissent

BROWN, J., Dissenting.

We granted review in this case to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal concerning the admissibility of battered women’s syndrome (BWS) testimony pursuant to Evidence Code section 11071 in the absence of evidence of a prior incident of domestic violence. *909(Compare People v. Williams (2000) 78 Cal.App,4th 1118 [93 Cal.Rptr.2d 356], with People v. Gomez (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 405 [85 Cal.Rptr.2d 101].) Rather than confront this question directly, the majority holds that the testimony in this case was, in any event, admissible under the more general provisions of section…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API