Legal Opinion
Outcom, Inc. v. City of Lake St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 24, 1996No. 69504PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Senior Judge.
Outcom, Inc. (“Outcom”) filed suit for declaratory judgment to declare an ordinance of the City of Lake St. Louis (“City”) regulating off-premises advertising signs to be invalid. The court held the ordinance was valid and Outcom has appealed contending that the ordinance is void because it contains regulations which do not conform to regulations contained in § 226.540, RSMo 1994.1 Reversed and remanded.
*2In 1994, Outcom made application to the City for permits to erect eight signs along I-70 on sites where Outcom had obtained the owners’ permission to erect a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Taylor v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- National Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dingeman Advertising, Inc. v. Village of Mt. ZionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Stephenson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Missouri State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coyle v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Outcom, Inc. v. City of Lake St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Drury Displays, Inc. v. City of ShrewsburyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- The Lamar Company, LLC v. City of Columbia, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.