Outcom, Inc. v. City of Lake St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES R. DOWD, Presiding Judge.
This case now makes its second appearance before this Court. In a prior appeal, we held that an ordinance of the City of Lake St. Louis (“City”) was invalid to the extent that it regulated the size, lighting, and spacing of off-premises advertising signs because the regulations conflicted with customary use as defined in section 226.540. Outcom, Inc. v. City of Lake St. Louis, 960 S.W.2d 1, 4-5 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). We declined to rule on the validity of regulations contained in the ordinance pertaining to setbacks for signs because the parties failed to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- McCollum v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- May Department Stores Co. v. County of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- National Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pope v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Guidry v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ironite Products Co., Inc. v. SamuelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Storage Masters-Chesterfield, L.L.C. v. City of ChesterfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Welman v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.