State v. Brunning
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we address the legitimacy of convictions of sex offenders, originally classified under Megan’s Law, who were indicted for violating the address-notification requirements of the Adam Walsh Act (“AWA”) before State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, 933 N.E.2d 753, made the requirements of the AWA inapplicable to such offenders. Specifically in this case, we address whether Bodyke requires the vacation of convictions when the conduct at issue — a failure to provide notice of a change of residence address— was a violation of R.C. 2950.05 both as it exists under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BuehnerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. GingellOhio Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Bradley v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- State v. MaddickesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Grant v. Collins (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BrunningOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.