Legal Opinion

State v. Items of Real Property Owned and/or Possessed by Chilinski

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2016No. DA 14-0299PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Article II, Section 26 of the Montana Constitution guarantees to individuals that the right to a jury trial is “secured to all and shall remain inviolate.” However, this inviolate right encompasses only non-equitable causes of action to which the right had already attached at common law when the Montana Constitution was adopted. At issue here is whether the right to a jury trial attaches to an in rem forfeiture proceeding arising from the alleged use of real property to manufacture dangerous drugs, but nonetheless unconnected to a state drug prosecution. The District Court ruled the right…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Nelson v. City of Billings and MMIAMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. A CAB, LLC v. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Roces v. Reno Hous. Auth.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API