State v. Items of Real Property Owned and/or Possessed by Chilinski
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON
¶1 Article II, Section 26 of the Montana Constitution guarantees to individuals that the right to a jury trial is “secured to all and shall remain inviolate.” However, this inviolate right encompasses only non-equitable causes of action to which the right had already attached at common law when the Montana Constitution was adopted. At issue here is whether the right to a jury trial attaches to an in rem forfeiture proceeding arising from the alleged use of real property to manufacture dangerous drugs, but nonetheless unconnected to a state drug prosecution. The District Court ruled the right…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Nelson v. City of Billings and MMIAMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- A CAB, LLC v. MURRAYNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Roces v. Reno Hous. Auth.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.