Legal Opinion

Lunt & Bell, LLC v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The respondents State of New York, New York State Attorney General, and New York State Comptroller (hereinafter collectively the State) correctly concede that the Court of Claims erred in denying the petition. After the State properly deposited the amount payable pursuant to an Agreement for Advance Payment in a special eminent domain account (see EDPL 304 [E] [1]; Matter of Mazur Bros. Realty, LLC v State of New York, 69 AD3d 726, 728-729 [2010]; Mazur Bros., Inc. v State of New York, 59 AD3d 399 [2009]), the petitioner, the owner of the condemned property, commenced the instant proceeding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Mazur Bros. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Herricks Fore Plan, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API