Hohensee v. Vanech
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
' PER CURIAM.
Appellant, plaintiff below, urges this court to reverse the trial court’s determination that under the provisions of Code 1951, 14 — 302, he failed to establish that decedent owed him $900 for professional services rendered to her prior to her death.
The claim advanced by appellant against decedent’s estate allegedly goes back to June 1953 when, he claims, he made an oral contract with decedent to set up a bookkeeping system for her. According to appellant, he instituted a system that covered the months back through December 1952 and he kept the records current from that time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rosinski v. WhitefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Fabrizio v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Davis v. CarmodyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gomez v. GomezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gomez v. GomezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975