Legal Opinion

Goedecke v. Mock Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1934No. Appeal 158PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is a suit by a real estate broker against a husband and wife to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by effecting a purchase of certain real estate for them. Plaintiff obtained a verdict against both defendants, and motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. were denied. The wife now appeals, claiming there was no evidence to show that she authorized plaintiff’s employment, and that judgment n. o. v. should therefore be entered in her favor.

Plaintiff’s case, which the jury accepted as true, is as follows: On April 20, 1929, George Mock,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newland v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ZIMMERMANN v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  2. ZIMMERMANN v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API