Legal Opinion

Newland v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1934No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Charles Newland, whose administratrix is now the appellant, sued the defendant railroad for damages alleged to have been sustained by him, by reason of its negligence. At the end of plaintiff’s case, defendant did not move for a nonsuit, but, when the evidence of both sides was closed, it presented a point for binding instructions in its favor. This point was refused, and plaintiff recovered a verdict; later the court in banc entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, and therefrom plaintiff appeals.

The only basis for entering the judgment, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Federal Sales Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Mundorff v. WickershamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Ward v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API