Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Mueller

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District, Meagher County. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Per curiam

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal from the order of the district conrt denying a new trial. The first ground of the motion is that the statement on motion for new trial was not served within the time provided by statute, or within the thirty days from the period to which it might be extended. (Comp. Stats., § 536, p. 201.)

We observe, by the record, that the time was extended very much more than thirty days, and without the consent of the opposite party; and if this were all that appeared, the statement on motion for new trial could not be considered. (Doyle v. Gore, 13 Mont. 471.)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. SinclairMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sweeney v. Great Falls & Canada Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Doyle v. GoreMontana Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vreeland v. EdensMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Murray v. HauserMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Coquard v. WeinsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API