Legal Opinion

Coquard v. Weinstein

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1895Published

Appeal from Third Judicial District, Deer Lodge County. On motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the record.

1Opinion of the CourtDeWitt, J.

— The respondent moves to strike from the record the bill of exceptions therein contained, for the reason *555that the judge wlio signed and settled the same had no jurisdiction so to do. The case was tried June 21,1893. On June 23d the court made an order granting thirty days’ time to prepare and file a bill of exceptions. The defendant, the appellant, served a bill of exceptions on respondent’s counsel on July 17, 1893. They filed the bill of exceptions with the clerk for the judge on July 23, 1893. On the same day the respondent’s counsel filed with the clerk their objections and exceptions to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Arnold v. SinclairMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sweeney v. Great Falls & Canada Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Walsh v. MuellerMontana Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API