Legal Opinion

Motor Supply Co. v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1931No. 4109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as above).

The appellant presents for determination the points in view that (1) the evidence fails to show performance by appellee of the contract as agreed upon, and recovery as upon quantum meruit was not sought in the petition; and (2) the appellee sued as a foreign corporation on a contract to be performed in Texas and with alleged performance of its terms in Texas, without alleging that it had a permit to do business in Texas. It is believed in the circumstances the first point should be sustained. By its terms the contract was to continue for “Four (4)” months,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. North American Service Co. v. A. T. Vick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Normandie Oil Corp. v. Oil Trading Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kutka v. Temporaries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  3. Western Outdoor Advertising Co. of Nebraska v. Berbiglia, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Alexander Film Co. v. BoxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Fate-Root-Heath Co. v. Howard Kenyon Dredging Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API