Legal Opinion

Boulder Creek Academy v. Kline

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 25, 2012No. 05-11-01361-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice O’NEILL.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss. In two issues, Boulder Creek Academy and Sheila Tart-Zelvin contend the trial court erred (1) in denying their motion to dismiss because the claims filed by Art Kline, Bridget Kline, and Davis Kline are health care liability claims and the Klines failed to file an expert report as required by Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 74.351, and (2) by refusing to admit exhibits into evidence at the hearing on the motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, we affirm…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. BIODERM SKIN CARE, LLC v. Sok, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Randol Mill Pharmacy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Randol Mill Pharmacy KVG Enterprises, Inc. Gary G. Daley John Wayne Bailey James Robert Forsythe Kevin Lynn Heide Julie Knowlton Lubbert And Cara Morrell v. Stacey Miller and Randy Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API