Randol Mill Pharmacy v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The primary issue we address in this appeal is whether a pharmacist’s act — of filling a bulk phone order placed by a doctor for over twenty 30-milliliter vials of an injectable form of the antioxidant supplement lipoic acid for use in the doctor’s office — constitutes dispensing a prescription medicine as required for the pharmacist to qualify as a health care provider under the Texas Medical Liability Act (TMLA). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 74.001(a)(12)(A)(iv), (22) (West Supp.2012). Because we hold that the answer to this question is no,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Randol Mill Pharmacy v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Rendon v. WalgreensDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- Randol Mill Pharmacy, Kvg Enterprises, Inc., Gary G. Daley, John Wayne Bailey, James Robert Forsythe, Kevin Lynn Heide, Julie Knowlton Lubbert, and Cara Morrell v. Stacey Miller and Randy MillerTexas Supreme Court · 2015