Back v. Kaufman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.
Plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite to restrain defendant union from picketing the premises where he practices his profession as a dentist, asserting that no labor dispute within the purview of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act exists between himself and the defendant. Other than one female office assistant, he employs no help. In connection with his work it becomes necessary for him to avail himself of the services of various dental laboratories for the construction of plates, bridges, inlays and other prosthetic appliances, and which are all supplied in accordance with his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brennan v. EisenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Texas State Optical v. Optical Workers Union 24859Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. v. HawleyNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Jacobs v. EisenNew York Supreme Court · 1947