Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Eisen

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrar, J.

Two motions are before the court. Plaintiffs move for a temporary injunction and defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. The latter will receive first consideration. It projects two questions: Is a “ labor dispute ” involved? Has defendant the right to picket plaintiffs’ offices? The facts are not disputed. Whether defendant is acting within its rights and whether section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act applies are disputed.

The defendant union is composed of dental technicians, whose members are conducting a strike at the plant of their employer, H. Brand Laboratories, Inc., located in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. People v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Strauss v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Back v. KaufmanNew York Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brennan v. EisenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Jacobs v. EisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API