Legal Opinion

(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 22, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01614Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN PAUL SMITH, No. 1:18-cv-01614-GSA 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 I. Introduction 19 Plaintiff Shawn Paul Smith (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 21 supplemental security income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is 22 currently…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API