Legal Opinion
BFI Group Divino Corp. v. JSC Russian Aluminum
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 2007No. 06 Civ. 2093(WCC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff BFI Group Divino Corporation brings this action for tortious interference with contractual relations, tortious interference with prospective business advantage, unfair competition and conspiracy to commit fraud against defendants JSC Russian Aluminum d/b/a RUSAL (“RUSAL”), JSC Bratsk Aluminum Plant (“Bratsk”), RUSAL America Corp. (“RUS-AL America”), Dayson Holding Ltd. (“Dayson”), and “Does 1-20,” several unnamed agents of the aforementioned corporate defendants (collectively, “defendants”). Plaintiffs allegations stem from…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Niv v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Online Payment Solutions Inc. v. Svenska Handelsbanken ABDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Allgood Entertainment, Inc. v. Dileo Entertainment & Touring, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- BFI Group Divino Corp. v. JSC Russian AluminumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Alayan v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United NationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.