Legal Opinion

Webb v. Larcade

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1931No. 801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

An automobile belonging to plaintiff, Dr. Webb, was seized under a fi. fa., the sale was enjoined by plaintiff, claiming it was exempt from seizure under article 644, C. P.

The exemption was maintained and the injunction perpetuated. Defendants appeal.

Plaintiff is a physician practicing his profession in the town of Rayne and surrounding country.

He testifies that this auto is his only means of transportation, and it is shown by several physicians who testified in the case that, without its use, plaintiff would “starve to death,” as they express it. It is therefore plain that the automobile is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v. RicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Prather v. BoboSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  3. Schwartz v. DennisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pellish Bros. v. CooperWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Holt v. FlournoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Morris-Wilson Buick Co. v. RobertsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. In Re VicknairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API