Legal Opinion
105 Mt. Kisco Associates LLC et, al v. Paul Carozza et, al
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 2019No. 7:15-cv-05346Unknown
1Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ‘DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED 105 MT. KISCO ASSOCIATES LLC, □□ AMANDA’S LANE LLC, and MARK STAGG, DATE FILED: | 2 (20/2014 _ Plaintiffs, -against- PAUL CAROZZA, RICHARD’S HOME CENTER & LUMBER, INC., RICHARD’S LUMBER & BUILDING MATERIALS CENTER, INC., . CANRAD as successor to CANADIAN RADIUM No oN > aes & URANIUM CORP., VILLAGE OF MOUNT KISCO, WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, UNITED STATES, WESTWOOD NUCLEAR CORP. as successor to ISOTOPES INC., NDL ORGANIZATION, INC., as successor to NUCLEAR DIAGNOSTICS LABORATORIES,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Goel v. Bunge, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.