Legal Opinion · Dissent

McAdams v. Barbieri

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 23, 1956Published

1DissentDaly, J.

This amendment should be examined with great strictness, since its purpose was to undermine the civil service by freezing into permanent positions almost 300 persons who failed to meet the qualifications which had been demanded of those already within the system. In Howe v. Civil Service Commission, 128 Conn. 35, 38, 20 A.2d 397, we quoted with approval the following from Matter of Sheridan v. Kern, 255 App. Div. 57, 63, 5 N.Y.S.2d 336: “Any method which results in improperly placing in permanent positions those who obtain temporary employment is a reversion to the [properly] condemned spoils…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Peo. Ex Rel. Hannan v. . Board of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Sheridan v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Hutchison v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Niedzwicki v. Pequonnock FoundrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API