Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co. v. Jones

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1906No. Appeal, No. 84PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 84, April T., 1906, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Cambria Co., June T., 1904, No. 5, on bill in equity in case of Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Company v. Edwin G. Jones et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before O’Connor, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. .Error assigned was decree awarding an injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Head, J.,

Some time prior to June 18, 1903, the defendant, Edwin G. Jones and his associates, acquired, by lease or purchase, the right to open and work the coal in a tract of land in Clearfield township, Cambria county, known as the “ Jordan Tract,” containing several hundred acres. This seam of coal appears to have been so located that mines could be opened and the production of coal begun without any great expenditure of time or perhaps of money. At the same time the Pennsylvania Coal Company, the complainant and appellee, was a large owner and operator in that and other portions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhea v. ForsythSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  2. Washburn's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Godino v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Scanlin v. Conshohocken BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Duncan v. H. & G. Iron Works, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chambersburg Woolen Co. v. HagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Richardson v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Bicking v. Florey's Brick WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Black v. Woodward, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API