Connell v. McNett
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Assumpsit by Catharine Connell against Jacob B. McNett for breach of warranty. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment in an action originally brought in justice’s court to recover damages for a breach of warranty on a sale of a mare. The mare was purchased by the plaintiff for a driving mare, and the price of $225 in cash paid. Plaintiff offered testimony tending to show that she incurred an expense of $18 in having the mare treated, and that the care and keeping of the mare was worth $10 per month, and that she had been so lame from the time when she was first *331delivered to her that she could not be put to any use, and that the lameness was the result of a permanent disease.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kempsey v. McGinnissMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Mooney v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Cole v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Cole v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smart v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Ebel v. Saginaw County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Brown v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Hapke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.