Legal Opinion

Stromberg, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1969No. Civ. 32987PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

On November 18, 1966, plaintiff filed the within “Complaint For Declaratory Relief” and damages ($194,000) alleging a written contract with defendant Los Angeles County Flood Control District under which it undertook to construct a storm drain, and that defendant delayed its construction, furnished inaccurate plans and specifications and failed to compensate it for extra work; and in paragraph X 1 that on June 8, 1966, it presented a claim to the board of supervisors and the same was denied. In its answer defendant denied all material allegations, specifically 2 paragraph X, set up…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dambro v. Union Cty. Pk. Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Dilts v. Cantua Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Johnson v. San Diego Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API