Legal Opinion

Yin Sang Shum v. Venell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when his automobile and the automobile of defendant Taylor collided in a dense cloud or plume of smoke which settled on the highway as a result of field burning by defendant Venell. Plaintiff charged defendant Taylor with negligence in the operation of his automobile and charged defendant Venell with negligence in failing to post signs or other warning devices indicating dense smoke for approaching traffic.

The facts are not in dispute. On September 5, 1972, plaintiff collected air samples in an area of field…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shelton v. LOWELLOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Austin Road Company v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Hinkel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Moore v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Boob v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Garrison v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Arney v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Yin Sang Shum v. VenellOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API