Legal Opinion

Yin Sang Shum v. Venell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

539 P.2d 1085 (1975)

YIN SANG SHUM, Appellant,

v.

Clarence VENELL, Respondent, James Arnold Taylor, Jr., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted July 9, 1975.

Decided September 18, 1975.

S. David Eves, Ringo, Walton & Eves, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

James C. Tait, Hibbard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

O'CONNELL, Chief Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when his automobile and the automobile of defendant Taylor…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Atchison v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Hudson v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Pitcairn v. WhitesideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Westerman. v. StoutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API