Legal Opinion

Ridgway v. Bowser & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1914No. 5226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Elberton — Joseph N: Worley, judge pro hac vice. August 15, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

Under the ruling in Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (43 S. E. 280), a verdict may be attacked by a direct assignment of error upon the ground that no cause of action is set forth in the petition. In the present case the plaintiffs could have maintained trover, but since the suit was an action upon a contract, and both the petition and the evidence discloses that there was no privity between the plaintiffs and the defendant, the court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiffs. Dickson v. Matthews, 10 Ga. App. 542 (73 S. E. 705).

Judgment reversed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Dickson v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gunn v. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Rhodes v. Savannah Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917