Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Johnson & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1923No. 12256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Since the sufficiency of a petition can not be questioned in a motion for a new trial, the defendant, in a proceeding by a lien holder to foreclose his lien by the statutory method providing for the filing of an affidavit as the initial process in the foreclosure proceedings, which is in the nature of a plaintiff’s petition, can not, in a motion for a new trial based -upon the ground that the verdict rendered for the plaintiff was contrary to law, insist upon the insufficiency of the affiant’s affidavit in failing to contain such an allegation. The above ruling is not to be construed as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Roberts v. KeelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Crew v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Henley v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Mayor of Griffin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powers v. WrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Grice v. GriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Turner v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Frost Motor Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Sharp v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API