Clark (Darryl) v. State

was therefore procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Further, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. See NRS 34.800(2). First, appellant claimed that he had good cause to excuse the procedural bars because he was challenging the jurisdiction of the district court and such claims may be raised at any time. Appellant's claims did not implicate the jurisdiction of the courts. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; NRS 171.010. Appellant's bare…