Legal Opinion
Daly v. Okamura
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1923No. Civil No. 2049PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. E. C. Stanford, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, J..This is a suit upon three promissory notes for $600 each, dated November 1, 1919, and due, respectively, November 1, 1920, February 1, 1921, and May 1, 1921. The defendants, Frank Okamnra and H. Yamamoto, were the makers and one Peter Kortsen the payee of notes. The plaintiff, F. E. Daly, alleges in his complaint that he is the owner and holder of notes, for value. The complaint was filed and summons issued November 21,
*51The reason given in affidavit for the failure to answer within the time allowed by law seems to have been the inability of the defendants and their attorney to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dowdy v. CalviArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- Beebe v. FarishArizona Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Puterman v. PutermanWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Cota v. SOUTHERN ARIZONA BANK & TRUST COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Mortgage Co. Holland America v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1924