Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Goldman
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*871OPINION OF THE COURT
Kristin Booth Glen, J.
This is a nonmatrimonial action for support and maintenance brought by plaintiff wife (the wife) and therein lies the problem, according to at least one portion of the motion to dismiss made by defendant husband (the husband). The jurisdictional question presented is of apparent first impression in this Department; two other issues, one concerning the limits of a cause of action for necessaries and the other, arising from the wife’s motion for temporary support, also require consideration of the relationship between this court’s general jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kagen v. KagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Elder v. . RosenwasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Rensselaer County Department of Social Services v. CossartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- In re the Estate of WeinbaumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Brentrup v. CulkinNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Hafner v. Security Pacific National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Merrick v. MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Venizelos v. VenizelosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995