People v. Heim
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Defendant Walter Heim appeals from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree on the grounds (1) that the uncertainty as to the violation charged in the information resulted in a denial of due process of law; (2) that certain evidence was obtained in violation of his constitutional guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure, and hence was inadmissible; and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment.
At approximately 11:35 p.m. on the evening of the alleged crime a merchant patrolman, one Hugh Clifton, while on patrol, heard the sound…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. PoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. DochertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. BrumleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.