Legal Opinion

People v. Heim

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1961No. Crim. 3149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Defendant Walter Heim appeals from a judgment of conviction finding him guilty of burglary in the second degree on the grounds (1) that the uncertainty as to the violation charged in the information resulted in a denial of due process of law; (2) that certain evidence was obtained in violation of his constitutional guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure, and hence was inadmissible; and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment.

At approximately 11:35 p.m. on the evening of the alleged crime a merchant patrolman, one Hugh Clifton, while on patrol, heard the sound…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. PoundsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. DochertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. BrumleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API