Legal Opinion
Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. v. Warwick (In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 24, 1993No. 19-35257PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR MANDATORY ABSTENTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1334(c)(2)
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Arnold S. Warwick, the defendant in this adversary proceeding (‘Warwick”), has moved for mandatory abstention pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(2). In support of his position, the defendant asserts that the adversary proceeding involves issues which are non-core and should be adjudicated in an identical action which is pending before the Civil Court of the City of New York. Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc., (“TMSI”), the Chapter 11 debtor and also the plaintiff in this action, has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allied Mechanical & Plumbing Corp. v. Dynamic Hostels Housing Development Fund Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc. v. White (In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Silverman v. U.W. Marx, Inc. (In Re Leco Enterprises, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- International Fidelity Insurance v. Robb (In Re Robb)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burger Boys, Inc. v. South Street Seaport Ltd. Partnership (In Re Burger Boys, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- AHT Corp. v. Bioshield Technologies, Inc. (In Re AHT Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001