Legal Opinion

Commer v. Potter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On October 14, 1920, plaintiffs purchased on land contracts two lots in Doxtator Center subdivision in Dearborn township, Wayne county, of the Dearborn Beal Homes Company, a Michigan corporation. Charles H. Doxtator was secretary of the company, its sales manager and had active charge of its affairs. Payments on the contracts were made to him. Defendant Potter was president of the company but does not appear to have been active at that time. Along in the fall of 1922, the officers of the company seem to have discovered that Doxtator was not dealing fairly with the company and defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Guffey v. O'ReileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Marussa v. TemerowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rice v. ScottRichmond City Circuit Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API