Legal Opinion

Marussa v. Temerowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Chester, J., presiding. Bill by Boleslaw Marussa and another against Frank Temerowski and others for the specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On the 2d day of September, 1913, defendants as vendors and plaintiffs as vendees entered into a land contract for the sale of the premises located at No. 1621 Jos. Campau Street, in the city of Detroit. The contract was in the usual form. The *272purchase price was $4,200, of which $1,000 down payment was acknowledged. Interest was to be paid semi-annually, December 10th and June 10th of each year; $100 on principal was due and payable at each interest period with the privilege of paying more, and the whole sum was payable in five years. There was a mortgage on the premises held by the Union…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake Erie Land Co. v. ChilinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Nelson v. BreitenwischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Commerce-Guardian Trust & Savings Bank v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Denby v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Clark v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Keyworth v. WiechersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API