Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Pool

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1919No. 10795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action of libel; from Gwinnett superior court—Judge Cobb. June 2, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

This was an action for damages based upon an alleged libel of the plaintiff by the defendant, and general and special damages were alleged. The libel consisted of a sign posted upon the land of the defendant and which could be seen by the public (as admitted in the answer), on which were these words: “Notice. Oscar Harrison and family stay off my land. You liar and thief let this alone. W. G. Pool.” The plaintiff’s demurrer, in the form of a written motion to strike, attacked the legal sufficiency of the defendant’s answer, on various general and special grounds,; and this motion was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Roberts v. RamseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melton v. BowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Duchess Chenilles Inc. v. MastersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Southland Corp. v. GarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Floyd v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Floyd v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API