Floyd v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentErankum, Judge
I agree with the majority opinion that the law of libel is broader than the law of slander, but I am of the opinion that the facts alleged in this petition do not bring this case within the so-called “libel per se” rule. It is pointed out in the majority opinion that the Georgia interpretation of libel is broader than in other jurisdictions, in that, not only do words alleged in a petition to be libelous per se ordinarily take their meaning from the words themselves, but the Georgia rule adds that should the words be ambiguous, a party may show by innuendo that one of the meanings of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Davis v. General Finance & Thrift Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Foster v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Lee v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Mell v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.