Legal Opinion

In re Starbucks Employee Gratuity Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 16, 2009No. 08 Civ. 3318(LTS)(JCF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Jeana Barenboim (“Barenboim”) and Jose Ortiz (“Ortiz”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), formerly employed as Baristas in stores operated by Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks” or “Defendant”), bring this putative statewide class action asserting various claims against Starbucks for alleged violations of several provisions of the New York Labor Law (“N.Y. Labor Law”). Plaintiffs’ first claim arises out of Starbucks’ policy of distributing tips to store Shift Supervisors, who Plaintiffs assert are agents of the employer and thus may not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barenboim v. starbucks, Winans v. Starbucks Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. Winans v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Hoxhaj v. Michael Cetta, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. Taqueria El Primo LLC v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API